Looking at our project's commit history, we'll notice that a new commit was created: a so-called "merge commit" that represents the actual "melting knot" that combines the two branches. With such perfect preparation, the actual merge process itself is easy as pie: $ git merge contact-form The last thing to check before actually starting the merge process is our current HEAD branch: we need to make sure that we've checked out the branch that should receive the changes.īut since we just updated "master" and already performed a "git checkout master", we're good to go! Starting the Merge If properly configured, a plain "git pull" should suffice (after making "master" our active branch): $ git checkout master
#MERGE BRANCH WITH MASTER GIT HUB UPDATE#
We must update "master" before we can integrate our own changes. The remark tells us that "master" has received new changes on the remote. Start with a "git fetch", followed by a "git branch -va": $ git fetch Both your local feature / bugfix / branch and the receiving branch should be updated with the latest changes from your remote server.
#MERGE BRANCH WITH MASTER GIT HUB CODE#
Preparing to Mergeīefore merging your code into one of your project's long-running branches (like a "development" or "master" branch), make sure that your local repository is up to date. Now, we need to push our merge local repo to remote repo: admin. Our goal is to integrate the changes from "contact-form" back into "master". Our GitHub now has only one branch which is master since another branch fix1 has been deleted. Simply log into the GitLab web app, choose the option to create a GitLab merge request, specify the master branch as the source and the protected branch as the target of the merge.Let's assume a very simple example scenario: Since the release branch is protected, the process is a little different. If a developer wants to merge the GitLab master into a protected branch, the proper approach is to perform a merge request. When the merge is complete, the release and master branch will be in sync. I can rectify this problem with a GitLab merge master into this branch. As a result, the release branch is out of sync with master. That sequence of events somewhat violates proper GitFlow rules, because those branches should’ve been merged into the release branch first. In a previous GitLab tutorial, both the develop branch and the hotfix branch was merged into master. Git push origin fun_feature GitLab master to branch merge request
Use git to merge master into the branch.Open a Terminal window on the client machine.The steps to merge master into any branch are: We will perform this merge master entirely on the client side and won’t involve the GitLab GUI in the process. The first GitLab merge master into a branch will be into the fun_feature branch. In the current state of my GitLab repository, I haven’t observed many GitFlow best practices and as a result, it has left the unprotected fun_feature branch several commits behind the master. As mentioned above, the three-way merge creates a merge commit in the target branch (here, master) that represents the work done in the feature branch (here, add-headings). Merge master into unprotected GitLab branch The remote GitLab branch to delete is name feature_fun.
0 kommentar(er)
